Athlon II M320 vs E2-9000

Athlon II M320 vs E2-9000 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II M320

2 / 2

1,795

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E2-9000

2 / 2

1,787

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II M320 vs E2-9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II M320 vs E2-9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II M320

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while E2-9000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

E2-9000

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,787 vs 1,795).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II M320 better than E2-9000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-9000 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II M320 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II M320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II M320 is the better buy right now. Athlon II M320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that E2-9000 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-9000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II M320 vs E2-9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II M320

The Athlon II M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $149.

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II M320 and E2-9000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II M320 versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the E2-9000. The Athlon II M320 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-9000 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M320 scores 1,795 against the E2-9000's 1,787 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II M320.

Feature	Athlon II M320	E2-9000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Caspian (2009)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,795	1,787
Geekbench 6 Single	188	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,955	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II M320 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-9000 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II M320	E2-9000
Socket	S1g3	BGA
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II M320) / not specified (E2-9000). Primary use case: Athlon II M320 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II M320 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400.