Athlon II N330 vs Celeron M 560

Athlon II N330 vs Celeron M 560 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II N330

2 / 2

1,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 560

1 / 1

2,008

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N330 vs Celeron M 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N330 vs Celeron M 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N330

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,999 vs 2,008).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than Athlon II N330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II N330 is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon II N330 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.8% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II N330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II N330 vs Celeron M 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N330

The Athlon II N330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,999 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II N330 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon II N330 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II N330 versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II N330. The Athlon II N330 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N330 scores 1,999 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	Athlon II N330	Celeron M 560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+8%	2.13 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,999	2,008

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N330 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Athlon II N330 versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the Athlon II N330 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II N330 supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 4 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: S1g4 (Athlon II N330) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560).

Feature	Athlon II N330	Celeron M 560
Socket	S1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066+60%	667
Max RAM Capacity	8+100%	4
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II N330) vs false (Celeron M 560). Direct competitor: Athlon II N330 rivals Pentium P6100; Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.

Feature	Athlon II N330	Celeron M 560
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	false

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N330 was priced at $100, while the Celeron M 560 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($100 vs $86), Celeron M 560 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N330 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 560 — making the Celeron M 560 the 15.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II N330	Celeron M 560
MSRP	$100	$86-14%
Performance per Dollar	20.0	23.3+17%
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Athlon II N330 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.