Athlon II P340
VS
Celeron M P4600

Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600

AMD

Athlon II P340

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron M P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M P4600

#824
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1338%
#825
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1318%
#826
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1210%
#827
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1205%
#828
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1194%
#830
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1153%
#831
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1105%
#832
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1104%
#833
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1074%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II P340 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M P4600 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II P340 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($10 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+51%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II P340 and Celeron M P4600

AMD

Athlon II P340

The Athlon II P340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,895 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P340 and Celeron M P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II P340 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II P340. The Athlon II P340 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P340 scores 1,895 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II P340.

FeatureAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,895
1,886
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P340 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
Socket
S1g4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II P340) / not specified (Celeron M P4600). Direct competitor: Athlon II P340 rivals Pentium P6000.

FeatureAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II P340 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Celeron M P4600 debuted at $86. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Athlon II P340 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II P340 delivers 189.5 pts/$ vs 125.7 pts/$ for the Celeron M P4600 — making the Athlon II P340 the 40.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II P340Celeron M P4600
MSRP
$0-100%
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
189.5+51%
125.7
Release Date
2010
2010