Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600

Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P340

2 / 2

1,895

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M P4600

2 / 2

1,886

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P340

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron M P4600

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II P340 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,886 vs 1,895).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Athlon II P340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II P340 better than Celeron M P4600?

Yes. Athlon II P340 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II P340 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II P340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II P340 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon II P340 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M P4600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II P340 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II P340 vs Celeron M P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P340

The Athlon II P340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,895 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P340 and Celeron M P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II P340 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II P340. The Athlon II P340 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P340 scores 1,895 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II P340.

Feature	Athlon II P340	Celeron M P4600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,895	1,886

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P340 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II P340	Celeron M P4600
Socket	S1g4	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II P340) / not specified (Celeron M P4600). Direct competitor: Athlon II P340 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Athlon II P340	Celeron M P4600
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II P340 was priced at $0, while the Celeron M P4600 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($0 vs $86), Athlon II P340 was $86 cheaper.

Feature	Athlon II P340	Celeron M P4600
MSRP	$0-100%	$86
Performance per Dollar	—	21.9
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Athlon II P340 on Amazon

Search Celeron M P4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.