
Athlon II X2 250e

Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 250e vs Athlon II X2 255 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 250e vs Athlon II X2 255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 250e vs Athlon II X2 255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 250e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 265).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (470 vs 500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 20.2 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Athlon II X2 255
2010Why buy it
- ✅+6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 255 better than Athlon II X2 250e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 250e vs Athlon II X2 255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 250e
The Athlon II X2 250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,202 points. Launch price was $77.

Athlon II X2 255
The Athlon II X2 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 250e and Athlon II X2 255 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 250e versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X2 255 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 255 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). Both are built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 250e scores 1,202 against the Athlon II X2 255's 1,210 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 255. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 265, a 5.8% lead for the Athlon II X2 255 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 470 vs 500 (6.2% advantage for the Athlon II X2 255). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250e | Athlon II X2 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,202 | 1,210 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 265+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 470 | 500+6% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 250e) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX,870,880G,890GX,890FX (Athlon II X2 255).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250e | Athlon II X2 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 250e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop, Athlon II X2 255 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 250e rivals Pentium E5700; Athlon II X2 255 rivals Pentium E5700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250e | Athlon II X2 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 250e was priced at $77, while the Athlon II X2 255 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($77 vs $60), Athlon II X2 255 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 250e delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 20.2 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 255 — making the Athlon II X2 255 the 25.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250e | Athlon II X2 255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $77 | $60-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 20.2+29% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















