
Athlon II X2 250u

Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Athlon II X2 250u vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 250u vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 250u vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 250u
2009Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $24 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- β Delivers 49.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
2007Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X2 250u across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (875 vs 935).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- β160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 250u better than Pentium Dual-Core E2160?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 250u vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 250u
The Athlon II X2 250u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $35.

Pentium Dual-Core E2160
The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000β2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 250u and Pentium Dual-Core E2160 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 250u versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 β a 11.8% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. The Athlon II X2 250u uses the Regor (2009β2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses NetBurst (2000β2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 250u scores 935 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2160's 875 β a 6.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 250u. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250u | Pentium Dual-Core E2160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009β2013) | NetBurst (2000β2006) |
| PassMark | 935+7% | 875 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 222 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 423 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 250u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250u | Pentium Dual-Core E2160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 250u) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2160). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 250u targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 250u rivals Core 2 Duo E7500.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250u | Pentium Dual-Core E2160 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 250u was priced at $60, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($60 vs $84), Athlon II X2 250u was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 250u delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 β making the Athlon II X2 250u the 39.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 250u | Pentium Dual-Core E2160 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-29% | $84 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6+50% | 10.4 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















