A4-1350
Athlon II X2 250u
A4-1350 vs Athlon II X2 250u Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-1350 vs Athlon II X2 250u FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-1350 vs Athlon II X2 250u: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-1350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 25W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Athlon II X2 250u needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (136 vs 222).
- ❌Lower PassMark (911 vs 935).
Athlon II X2 250u
2009Why buy it
- ✅+63.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A4-1350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 25W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 250u better than A4-1350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-1350 vs Athlon II X2 250u Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-1350
The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.
Athlon II X2 250u
The Athlon II X2 250u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $35.
Processing Power
The A4-1350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X2 250u offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-1350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1350 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 250u — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 250u. The A4-1350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 250u uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Athlon II X2 250u's 935 — a 2.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 250u. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 136 vs 222, a 48% lead for the Athlon II X2 250u that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 911 | 935+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 136 | 222+63% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 423 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 250u uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1350) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 250u). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1350) vs 16 (Athlon II X2 250u) — the Athlon II X2 250u offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-1350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Athlon II X2 250u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet, Athlon II X2 250u targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740; Athlon II X2 250u rivals Core 2 Duo E7500.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Tablet | Low Power Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1350 and Athlon II X2 250u
