A4-1350 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350

A4-1350 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 Performance Spectrum

A4-1350

4 / 4

911

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 BE-2350

2 / 2

975

+7.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1350 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1350 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1350

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Athlon X2 BE-2350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 BE-2350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (911 vs 975).

Athlon X2 BE-2350

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $90 MSRP, while A4-1350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 BE-2350 better than A4-1350?

Yes. Athlon X2 BE-2350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 BE-2350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 BE-2350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 BE-2350 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 BE-2350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $90 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1350 vs Athlon X2 BE-2350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1350

The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon X2 BE-2350

The Athlon X2 BE-2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 975 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-1350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1350 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — a 71% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2350. The A4-1350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Athlon X2 BE-2350's 975 — a 6.8% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-1350	Athlon X2 BE-2350
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.1 GHz+110%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark	911	975+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	136	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the A4-1350 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — the A4-1350 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2350 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1350) vs 2 (Athlon X2 BE-2350). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1350) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2350) — the A4-1350 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-1350	Athlon X2 BE-2350
Socket	FT3	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-1350) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2350). The A4-1350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740.