A4-1350 vs Celeron P4600

A4-1350 vs Celeron P4600 Performance Spectrum

A4-1350

4 / 4

911

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron P4600

2 / 2

965

+5.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1350 vs Celeron P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1350 vs Celeron P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1350

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (911 vs 965).

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅+5.9% higher PassMark.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A4-1350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-1350 better than Celeron P4600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-1350 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 pulls ahead with 5.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-1350 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron P4600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1350 vs Celeron P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1350

The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron P4600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-1350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1350 versus 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 — a 163.6% clock advantage for the A4-1350. The A4-1350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron P4600 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Celeron P4600's 965 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron P4600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1350 vs 2 MB on the Celeron P4600.

Feature	A4-1350	Celeron P4600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz+900%	0.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark	911	965+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	136	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1350) vs 2 (Celeron P4600). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1350) vs 16 (Celeron P4600) — the Celeron P4600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-1350	Celeron P4600
Socket	FT3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-1350) vs true (Celeron P4600). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1350) and Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron P4600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.