A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100
A4-1350
Celeron T3100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1350 is positioned at rank 972 and the Celeron T3100 is on rank 970, so the Celeron T3100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-1350
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-1350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($62) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-1350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($62) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-1350 and Celeron T3100
A4-1350
The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron T3100
The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A4-1350 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron T3100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 136 vs 350, a 88.1% lead for the Celeron T3100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1350 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | — |
| PassMark | 911 | 945+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 136 | 350+157% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1350) vs 2 (Celeron T3100). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1350) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the A4-1350 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-1350) vs None (Celeron T3100). The A4-1350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet, Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740.
| Feature | A4-1350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Tablet | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1350 and Celeron T3100
