A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100

A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100 Performance Spectrum

A4-1350

4 / 4

911

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron T3100

945

+3.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1350

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Celeron T3100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (911 vs 945).

Celeron T3100

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while A4-1350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3100 better than A4-1350?

Yes. Celeron T3100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T3100 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $62 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1350 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1350

The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1350 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron T3100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 136 vs 350, a 88.1% lead for the Celeron T3100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1350 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.

Feature	A4-1350	Celeron T3100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	911	945+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	136	350+157%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the A4-1350 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron T3100 — the A4-1350 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1350) vs 2 (Celeron T3100). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1350) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the A4-1350 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-1350	Celeron T3100
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-1350) vs None (Celeron T3100). The A4-1350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet, Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740.