Athlon II X3 400e
VS
Atom Z2580

Athlon II X3 400e vs Atom Z2580

AMD

Athlon II X3 400e

3 Cores3 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Atom Z2580

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X3 400e is positioned at rank 938 and the Atom Z2580 is on rank 9, so the Atom Z2580 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 400e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23615%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22314%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16202%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4881%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3382%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1937%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1912%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1741%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1741%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1721%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1675%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1651%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1645%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1630%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#939
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
99%
#940
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
99%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
99%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
99%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
97%
#947
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
96%
#948
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
95%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
95%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z2580

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
113%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
111%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
102%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
101%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
100%
#9
Atom Z2580
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
97%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
93%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
93%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
90%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
83%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
82%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
81%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
73%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
70%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X3 400e delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom Z2580 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II X3 400eAtom Z2580
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clovertrail (2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X3 400eAtom Z2580
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X3 400e and Atom Z2580

AMD

Athlon II X3 400e

The Athlon II X3 400e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,320 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Atom Z2580

The Atom Z2580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,303 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 400e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Atom Z2580 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 400e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 400e versus 2 GHz on the Atom Z2580 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 400e. The Athlon II X3 400e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom Z2580 uses Clovertrail (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 400e scores 1,320 against the Atom Z2580's 1,303 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon II X3 400e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X3 400eAtom Z2580
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Rana (2009−2011)
Clovertrail (2013)
PassMark
1,320+1%
1,303
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 400e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z2580 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 400e versus LPDDR2-1066 on the Atom Z2580 — the Athlon II X3 400e supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 400e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 400e) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2580).

FeatureAthlon II X3 400eAtom Z2580
Socket
AM3
FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
LPDDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+1500%
2 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z2580 includes integrated graphics (PowerVR SGX544MP2), while the Athlon II X3 400e requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon II X3 400eAtom Z2580
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
PowerVR SGX544MP2