
Athlon II X3 400e

Core i5-480M
Athlon II X3 400e vs Core i5-480M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 400e vs Core i5-480M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X3 400e vs Core i5-480M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 400e
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,320 vs 1,327).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-480M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-480M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($81 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Athlon II X3 400e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-480M better than Athlon II X3 400e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 400e vs Core i5-480M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 400e
The Athlon II X3 400e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,320 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-480M
The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 400e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i5-480M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 400e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 400e versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M — a 28.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-480M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Athlon II X3 400e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-480M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 400e scores 1,320 against the Core i5-480M's 1,327 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-480M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 400e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 400e | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.93 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.66 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,320 | 1,327 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 400e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-480M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 400e versus 1066 on the Core i5-480M — the Athlon II X3 400e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 400e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 400e) vs 16 (Core i5-480M) — the Core i5-480M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 400e) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 400e | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+25% | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 400e) / true (Core i5-480M). The Core i5-480M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X3 400e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 400e | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X3 400e was priced at $100, while the Core i5-480M came in at $81. On launch pricing ($100 vs $81), Core i5-480M was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 400e delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-480M — making the Core i5-480M the 21.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 400e | Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $81-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.2 | 16.4+24% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















