Athlon II X3 425
Pro A6-8500B
Athlon II X3 425 vs Pro A6-8500B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 425 vs Pro A6-8500B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X3 425 vs Pro A6-8500B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 425
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $79 MSRP, while Pro A6-8500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
Pro A6-8500B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,592 vs 1,595).
Quick Answers
So, is Pro A6-8500B better than Athlon II X3 425?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 425 vs Pro A6-8500B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X3 425
The Athlon II X3 425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,595 points. Launch price was $42.
Pro A6-8500B
The Pro A6-8500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,592 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 425 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Pro A6-8500B offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 425 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A6-8500B — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Pro A6-8500B (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X3 425 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A6-8500B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 425 scores 1,595 against the Pro A6-8500B's 1,592 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X3 425.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 425 | Pro A6-8500B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+69% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1024 kB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 1,595 | 1,592 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 425 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pro A6-8500B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 425 | Pro A6-8500B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X3 425 and Pro A6-8500B
