Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i3-3220T

AMD

Athlon II X3 460

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i3-3220T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i3-3220T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i3-3220T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 460

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $62 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 72.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3220T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-3220T

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Athlon II X3 460 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X3 460 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,953 vs 1,965).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 460 better than Core i3-3220T?
Yes. Athlon II X3 460 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 460 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon II X3 460 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 460 comes in $62 cheaper on MSRP at $87 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 72.3% better value on MSRP (22.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3220T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i3-3220T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X3 460

The Athlon II X3 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 460 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 460 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X3 460 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 460 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X3 460 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 460 scores 1,965 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X3 460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 384 vs 465, a 19.1% lead for the Core i3-3220T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 460 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

FeatureAthlon II X3 460Core i3-3220T
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+21%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+21%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Rana (2009−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,965
1,953
Geekbench 6 Single
384
465+21%
Geekbench 6 Multi
944
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 460 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 460 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3220T — the Core i3-3220T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3220T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 460) vs 16 (Core i3-3220T) — the Core i3-3220T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,770,785G,790FX,870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 460) and B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T).

FeatureAthlon II X3 460Core i3-3220T
Socket
AM3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 460) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Athlon II X3 460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X3 460 targets Budget, Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

FeatureAthlon II X3 460Core i3-3220T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X3 460 was priced at $87, while the Core i3-3220T came in at $149. On launch pricing ($87 vs $149), Athlon II X3 460 was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 460 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-3220T — making the Athlon II X3 460 the 53.1% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X3 460Core i3-3220T
MSRP
$87-42%
$149
Performance per Dollar
22.6+73%
13.1
Release Date
2011
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.