A8-6500T
VS
Athlon II X3 460

A8-6500T vs Athlon II X3 460

AMD

A8-6500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 460

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500T is positioned at rank 557 and the Athlon II X3 460 is on rank 734, so the A8-6500T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8912%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6471%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1351%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
774%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
764%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
660%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#557
A8-6500T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13799%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13039%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9467%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2852%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2259%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1976%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1132%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1117%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1017%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1017%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1006%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
979%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
965%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
961%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
952%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
100%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
100%
#737
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
100%
#738
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
99%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
98%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X3 460 leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-6500T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-6500TAthlon II X3 460
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-6500TAthlon II X3 460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500T and Athlon II X3 460

AMD

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

AMD

Athlon II X3 460

The Athlon II X3 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 460 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A8-6500T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X3 460 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 460 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 460 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Athlon II X3 460's 1,965 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-6500T.

FeatureA8-6500TAthlon II X3 460
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+33%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+62%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,983
1,965
Geekbench 6 Single
384
Geekbench 6 Multi
944
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 460 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 460 — the A8-6500T supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500T) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 460) — the A8-6500T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and 760G,770,785G,790FX,870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 460).

FeatureA8-6500TAthlon II X3 460
Socket
FM2
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64
16 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500T) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X3 460). The A8-6500T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8550D), while the Athlon II X3 460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X3 460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T.

FeatureA8-6500TAthlon II X3 460
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8550D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget