A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560
A8-6500T
Celeron M 560
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500T is positioned at rank 557 and the Celeron M 560 is on rank 819, so the A8-6500T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-6500T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 560
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-6500T | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-6500T | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500T and Celeron M 560
A8-6500T
The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.
Celeron M 560
The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A8-6500T has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 37.1% clock advantage for the A8-6500T. The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron M 560.
| Feature | A8-6500T | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+300% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+46% | 2.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,983 | 2,008+1% |
Memory & Platform
The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the A8-6500T supports 94.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 4 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500T) vs 0 (Celeron M 560) — the A8-6500T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560).
| Feature | A8-6500T | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1866+180% | 667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64+1500% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500T) vs false (Celeron M 560). The A8-6500T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8550D), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T; Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | A8-6500T | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8550D | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-6500T and Celeron M 560
