A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560

A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560 Performance Spectrum

A8-6500T

4 / 4

1,983

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 560

1 / 1

2,008

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500T

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8550D, while Celeron M 560 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron M 560.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,983 vs 2,008).
❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A8-6500T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than A8-6500T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-6500T is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A8-6500T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-6500T vs Celeron M 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A8-6500T has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 37.1% clock advantage for the A8-6500T. The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	A8-6500T	Celeron M 560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+46%	2.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4096 kB+300%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,983	2,008+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the A8-6500T supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 4 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500T) vs 0 (Celeron M 560) — the A8-6500T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560).

Feature	A8-6500T	Celeron M 560
Socket	FM2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1866+180%	667
Max RAM Capacity	64+1500%	4
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500T) vs false (Celeron M 560). The A8-6500T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8550D), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T; Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.