A8-6500T vs Core i3-5005U

A8-6500T vs Core i3-5005U Performance Spectrum

A8-6500T

4 / 4

1,983

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-5005U

2 / 4

2,012

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500T vs Core i3-5005U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500T vs Core i3-5005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-5005U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,983 vs 2,012).

Core i3-5005U

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-5005U better than A8-6500T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-6500T is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5005U pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5005U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-5005U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-5005U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-5005U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-6500T vs Core i3-5005U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-5005U

The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-5005U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U — a 43.1% clock advantage for the A8-6500T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-5005U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Core i3-5005U's 2,012 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-5005U.

Feature	A8-6500T	Core i3-5005U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+55%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	1,983	2,012+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	617
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,227

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-5005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U — the A8-6500T supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500T) vs 12 (Core i3-5005U) — the A8-6500T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U).

Feature	A8-6500T	Core i3-5005U
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8550D (A8-6500T) and Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5005U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T.