A8-6500T
VS
Core M-5Y71

A8-6500T vs Core M-5Y71

AMD

A8-6500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core M-5Y71

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500T is positioned at rank 557 and the Core M-5Y71 is on rank 1160, so the A8-6500T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8912%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6471%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1351%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
774%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
764%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
660%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#557
A8-6500T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y71

#1148
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4174%
#1149
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4112%
#1150
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3775%
#1151
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3758%
#1152
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3724%
#1154
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3596%
#1155
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3448%
#1156
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3442%
#1157
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3350%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1168
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-6500T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core M-5Y71 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-6500TCore M-5Y71
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-6500TCore M-5Y71
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500T and Core M-5Y71

AMD

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core M-5Y71

The Core M-5Y71 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,975 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y71 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.9 GHz on the Core M-5Y71 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the A8-6500T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y71 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Core M-5Y71's 1,975 — a 0.4% lead for the A8-6500T.

FeatureA8-6500TCore M-5Y71
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+7%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+75%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark
1,983
1,975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y71 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-6500TCore M-5Y71
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-6500T) / not specified (Core M-5Y71). The A8-6500T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8550D), while the Core M-5Y71 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T.

FeatureA8-6500TCore M-5Y71
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8550D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true