A8-6500T vs Celeron N3450

A8-6500T vs Celeron N3450 Performance Spectrum

A8-6500T

4 / 4

1,983

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3450

4 / 4

1,981

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500T vs Celeron N3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500T vs Celeron N3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500T

2013

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N3450.

Trade-offs

❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.

Celeron N3450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,981 vs 1,983).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500T.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500T better than Celeron N3450?

Yes. A8-6500T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500T still makes the most sense overall. A8-6500T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-6500T vs Celeron N3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron N3450

The Celeron N3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,981 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-6500T and Celeron N3450 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron N3450 — a 34% clock advantage for the A8-6500T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3450 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Celeron N3450's 1,981 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-6500T.

Feature	A8-6500T	Celeron N3450
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+41%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+91%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+100%	2 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,983	1,981

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3450 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus 2400 on the Celeron N3450 — the Celeron N3450 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-6500T) vs 6 (Celeron N3450) — the A8-6500T offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and FCBGA1296 (Celeron N3450).

Feature	A8-6500T	Celeron N3450
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	2400+29%
Max RAM Capacity	64+700%	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8550D (A8-6500T) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3450) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T; Celeron N3450 rivals AMD A4-9120.