A8-6500T
VS
Core 2 Duo T7600

A8-6500T vs Core 2 Duo T7600

AMD

A8-6500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7600

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-6500T is positioned at rank 557 and the Core 2 Duo T7600 is on rank 875, so the A8-6500T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8912%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6471%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1351%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
774%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
764%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
660%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#557
A8-6500T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7600

#863
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1450%
#864
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1428%
#865
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1311%
#866
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1305%
#867
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1293%
#869
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1249%
#870
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1198%
#871
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1196%
#872
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1164%
#875
Core 2 Duo T7600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#883
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8-6500T (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8-6500TCore 2 Duo T7600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7600 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8-6500TCore 2 Duo T7600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-6500T and Core 2 Duo T7600

AMD

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7600

The Core 2 Duo T7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,004 points. Launch price was $619.

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7600 — a 28.4% clock advantage for the A8-6500T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Core 2 Duo T7600's 2,004 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7600.

FeatureA8-6500TCore 2 Duo T7600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+33%
2.33 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.33 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
4 MB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,983
2,004+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7600 — the A8-6500T supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 4 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo T7600).

FeatureA8-6500TCore 2 Duo T7600
Socket
FM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1866+93200%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
64
4 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500T) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7600). The A8-6500T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8550D), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T.

FeatureA8-6500TCore 2 Duo T7600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8550D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x