
Athlon II X3 460

Core i5-2410M
Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i5-2410M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i5-2410M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i5-2410M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 460
2011Why buy it
- ✅+3.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $138 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-2410M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (384 vs 444).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2410M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2410M
2011Why buy it
- ✅+15.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon II X3 460 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (913 vs 944).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.7 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 460.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 460 better than Core i5-2410M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 460 vs Core i5-2410M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 460
The Athlon II X3 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-2410M
The Core i5-2410M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,954 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 460 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i5-2410M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 460 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X3 460 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2410M — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 460 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon II X3 460 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2410M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 460 scores 1,965 against the Core i5-2410M's 1,954 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X3 460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 384 vs 444, a 14.5% lead for the Core i5-2410M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 944 vs 913 (3.3% advantage for the Athlon II X3 460). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 460 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 460 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,965 | 1,954 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 384 | 444+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 944+3% | 913 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 460 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2410M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 460) vs 16 (Core i5-2410M) — the Core i5-2410M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,770,785G,790FX,870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 460) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2410M).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 460 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 460) vs true (Core i5-2410M). The Core i5-2410M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X3 460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X3 460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2410M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 460 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X3 460 was priced at $87, while the Core i5-2410M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($87 vs $225), Athlon II X3 460 was $138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 460 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-2410M — making the Athlon II X3 460 the 88.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 460 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87-61% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.6+160% | 8.7 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















