Athlon II X4 638
VS
Core 2 Duo T6570

Athlon II X4 638 vs Core 2 Duo T6570

AMD

Athlon II X4 638

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6570

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 638 is positioned at rank 1040 and the Core 2 Duo T6570 is on rank 222, so the Core 2 Duo T6570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 638

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41396%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8556%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6777%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5929%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3396%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3052%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3051%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2895%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2883%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2857%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
95%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
93%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
92%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
91%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
91%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
90%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6570

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#210
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
387%
#211
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
381%
#212
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
350%
#213
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
349%
#214
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
345%
#216
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
334%
#217
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
320%
#218
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
319%
#219
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
311%
#222
Core 2 Duo T6570
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 638 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T6570 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II X4 638Core 2 Duo T6570
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X4 638Core 2 Duo T6570
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 638 and Core 2 Duo T6570

AMD

Athlon II X4 638

The Athlon II X4 638 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,260 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6570

The Core 2 Duo T6570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,274 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 638 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6570 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 638 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X4 638 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6570 — a 25% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 638 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 638 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6570 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 638 scores 2,260 against the Core 2 Duo T6570's 2,274 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6570. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 638 vs 2 MB on the Core 2 Duo T6570.

FeatureAthlon II X4 638Core 2 Duo T6570
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,260
2,274
Geekbench 6 Single
246
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 638 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 638) and GM45,PM45,GL40 (Core 2 Duo T6570).

FeatureAthlon II X4 638Core 2 Duo T6570
Socket
FM1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 638) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6570). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T6570 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureAthlon II X4 638Core 2 Duo T6570
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget