Athlon II X4 651 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 651 vs Ryzen 3 2200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 651 vs Ryzen 3 2200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 651

2011

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $92 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 2200U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 2200U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,583 vs 3,584).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 2200U better than Athlon II X4 651?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 3 2200U is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 651 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 651 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 2200U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 2200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $92 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 651 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 651 vs Ryzen 3 2200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 651

The Athlon II X4 651 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,584 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 2200U

The Ryzen 3 2200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,583 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 651 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 3 2200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 651 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 651 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200U — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2200U (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon II X4 651 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 651 scores 3,584 against the Ryzen 3 2200U's 3,583 — a 0% lead for the Athlon II X4 651. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 651 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200U.

Feature	Athlon II X4 651	Ryzen 3 2200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	3,584	3,583

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 651 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.