
Athlon II X4 740

Pro A12-8800B
Athlon II X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 740
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $329 less on MSRP ($71 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- β Delivers 465.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($71 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Pro A12-8800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pro A12-8800B
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Athlon II X4 740 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,677).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 37.7 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $71 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 740 better than Pro A12-8800B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 740
The Athlon II X4 740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Piledriver architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,677 points. Launch price was $71.

Pro A12-8800B
The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015β2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 740 and Pro A12-8800B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Athlon II X4 740 versus 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B β a 8.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 740 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 740 uses the Piledriver architecture (32 nm), while the Pro A12-8800B uses Carrizo (2015β2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 740 scores 2,677 against the Pro A12-8800B's 2,667 β a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 740.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 740 | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2048 kB |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Piledriver | Carrizo (2015β2018) |
| PassMark | 2,677 | 2,667 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 528 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,144 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 740 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pro A12-8800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 740 versus DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B β the Pro A12-8800B supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon II X4 740) and Socket FP4 (Pro A12-8800B).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 740 | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-2133+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 740) / AMD-V (Pro A12-8800B). The Pro A12-8800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 740 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 740 | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 740 was priced at $71, while the Pro A12-8800B came in at $400. On launch pricing ($71 vs $400), Athlon II X4 740 was $329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 740 delivers 37.7 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Pro A12-8800B β making the Athlon II X4 740 the 139.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 740 | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $71-82% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+463% | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















