Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom x5-Z8350

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom x5-Z8350 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Silver 3050U

2 / 2

2,950

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x5-Z8350

4 / 4

2,979

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom x5-Z8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom x5-Z8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Silver 3050U

2020

Why buy it

✅700% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 1) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-Z8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,950 vs 2,979).

Atom x5-Z8350

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-Z8350 better than Athlon Silver 3050U?

Yes. Atom x5-Z8350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x5-Z8350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-Z8350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-Z8350 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x5-Z8350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Silver 3050U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom x5-Z8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050U

The Athlon Silver 3050U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,950 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom x5-Z8350

The Atom x5-Z8350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: 4 GB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Silver 3050U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050U versus 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8350 — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon Silver 3050U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050U uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8350 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050U scores 2,950 against the Atom x5-Z8350's 2,979 — a 1% lead for the Atom x5-Z8350. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver 3050U vs 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8350.

Feature	Athlon Silver 3050U	Atom x5-Z8350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+67%	1.92 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+53%	1.44 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Dali (Zen) (2020)	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,950	2,979
Cinebench R23 Multi	900	—
Geekbench 6 Single	873	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,524	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Silver 3050U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x5-Z8350 uses UTFCBGA592 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050U versus DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8350 — the Athlon Silver 3050U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Silver 3050U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Silver 3050U) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8350). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver 3050U) vs 1 (Atom x5-Z8350) — the Athlon Silver 3050U offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Athlon Silver 3050U) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8350).

Feature	Athlon Silver 3050U	Atom x5-Z8350
Socket	FP5	UTFCBGA592
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-RS 1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+1500%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+700%	1

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon Silver 3050U) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8350). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Silver 3050U) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon Silver 3050U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon Silver 3050U rivals Pentium Gold 7505.