Athlon Silver 3050U vs Core i3-10100Y

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Core i3-10100Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon Silver 3050U

2 / 2

2,950

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-10100Y

2 / 4

2,918

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Core i3-10100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Core i3-10100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Silver 3050U

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Core i3-10100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-10100Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,918 vs 2,950).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Silver 3050U better than Core i3-10100Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10100Y is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver 3050U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver 3050U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Silver 3050U still makes the most sense overall. Athlon Silver 3050U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Silver 3050U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Silver 3050U vs Core i3-10100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050U

The Athlon Silver 3050U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,950 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-10100Y

The Core i3-10100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,918 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Silver 3050U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-10100Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050U versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10100Y — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100Y (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050U uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050U scores 2,950 against the Core i3-10100Y's 2,918 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver 3050U vs 4 MB on the Core i3-10100Y.

Feature	Athlon Silver 3050U	Core i3-10100Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.9 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Dali (Zen) (2020)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,950+1%	2,918
Cinebench R23 Multi	900	—
Geekbench 6 Single	873	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,524	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Silver 3050U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Silver 3050U	Core i3-10100Y
Socket	FP5	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon Silver 3050U) / not specified (Core i3-10100Y). The Athlon Silver 3050U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i3-10100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon Silver 3050U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon Silver 3050U rivals Pentium Gold 7505.