
Athlon X4 870K

Core i3-4340
Athlon X4 870K vs Core i3-4340 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 870K vs Core i3-4340 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 870K vs Core i3-4340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 870K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($90 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($90 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,443 vs 3,490).
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4340 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4340.
Core i3-4340
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Athlon X4 870K needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 870K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 870K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.4 vs 38.3 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 870K better than Core i3-4340?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 870K vs Core i3-4340 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 870K
The Athlon X4 870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,443 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-4340
The Core i3-4340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,490 points. Launch price was $210.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 870K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4340 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 870K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4340 — a 13% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 870K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 870K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4340 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 870K scores 3,443 against the Core i3-4340's 3,490 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-4340.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+14% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,443 | 3,490+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,024 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4340 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 870K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4340 — the Athlon X4 870K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 870K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 870K) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4340).
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 870K) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4340). The Core i3-4340 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Athlon X4 870K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4340 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4340 rivals FX-6350.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 870K was priced at $90, while the Core i3-4340 came in at $149. On launch pricing ($90 vs $149), Athlon X4 870K was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 870K delivers 38.3 pts/$ vs 23.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-4340 — making the Athlon X4 870K the 48.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Core i3-4340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $90-40% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+64% | 23.4 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















