
Athlon X4 870K

Phenom II X6 1065T
Athlon X4 870K vs Phenom II X6 1065T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 870K vs Phenom II X6 1065T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 870K vs Phenom II X6 1065T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 870K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $336 less on MSRP ($90 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 377.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($90 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Phenom II X6 1065T
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 870K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,412 vs 3,443).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 38.3 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 870K better than Phenom II X6 1065T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 870K vs Phenom II X6 1065T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 870K
The Athlon X4 870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,443 points. Launch price was $149.

Phenom II X6 1065T
The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 870K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1065T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 870K versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 870K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 870K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 870K scores 3,443 against the Phenom II X6 1065T's 3,412 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X4 870K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+21% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+34% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,443 | 3,412 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 870K was priced at $90, while the Phenom II X6 1065T came in at $426. On launch pricing ($90 vs $426), Athlon X4 870K was $336 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 870K delivers 38.3 pts/$ vs 8.0 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1065T — making the Athlon X4 870K the 130.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 870K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $90-79% | $426 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+379% | 8.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















