
Athlon X4 880K

Core i5-4460T
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i5-4460T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i5-4460T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i5-4460T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 880K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $92 less on MSRP ($95 MSRP vs $187 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($95 MSRP vs $187 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,649 vs 3,651).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460T.
Core i5-4460T
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Athlon X4 880K needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 880K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 880K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 38.4 PassMark/$ ($187 MSRP vs $95 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 880K better than Core i5-4460T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i5-4460T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 880K
The Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,649 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4460T
The Core i5-4460T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,651 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X4 880K and Core i5-4460T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 880K versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4460T — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 880K (base: 4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 880K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4460T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 880K scores 3,649 against the Core i5-4460T's 3,651 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4460T.
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+56% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+111% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,649 | 3,651 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 807 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4460T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 880K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4460T — the Athlon X4 880K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 880K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 880K) and H81,H87,Z87,Q87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4460T).
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 880K) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4460T). The Core i5-4460T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Athlon X4 880K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4460T rivals A8-7600.
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 880K was priced at $95, while the Core i5-4460T came in at $187. On launch pricing ($95 vs $187), Athlon X4 880K was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 880K delivers 38.4 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4460T — making the Athlon X4 880K the 65.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $95-49% | $187 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4+97% | 19.5 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















