
Athlon X4 880K

Core i7-10510Y
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i7-10510Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i7-10510Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i7-10510Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 880K
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10510Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10510Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-10510Y
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 617, while Athlon X4 880K needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,631 vs 3,649).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 880K better than Core i7-10510Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 880K vs Core i7-10510Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 880K
The Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,649 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-10510Y
The Core i7-10510Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 880K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-10510Y's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 880K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10510Y — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510Y (base: 4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Athlon X4 880K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-10510Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 880K scores 3,649 against the Core i7-10510Y's 3,631 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X4 880K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+233% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Comet Lake-Y (2019) |
| PassMark | 3,649 | 3,631 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10510Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Athlon X4 880K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 880K) vs 10 (Core i7-10510Y) — the Athlon X4 880K offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 880K) and Comet Lake-Y (Core i7-10510Y).
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | UTFCBGA1377 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | LPDDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 880K) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510Y). The Core i7-10510Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 617), while the Athlon X4 880K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.
| Feature | Athlon X4 880K | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Ultrabook/Tablet |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















