Athlon XP 1500+ vs Pentium 4 1.80

AMD

Athlon XP 1500+

1 Cores1 Thrd60 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2001
Similar parts
····
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

1 Cores1 Thrd67 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 1500+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1500+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1500+ vs Pentium 4 1.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1500+

2001

Why buy it

  • Costs $432 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Delivers 261.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.4 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium 4 1.80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (188 vs 225).

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.4 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 4 1.80 better than Athlon XP 1500+?
Yes. Pentium 4 1.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 19.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 1.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 1.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 19.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium 4 1.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 4 1.80 comes in 332.3% more expensive on MSRP at $562 MSRP versus $130 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 1500+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 261.2% better value on paper (1.4 vs 0.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 4 1.80 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 1500+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1500+

The Athlon XP 1500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Palomino (2001) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 188 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1500+ and Pentium 4 1.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Athlon XP 1500+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 — a 30% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Athlon XP 1500+ uses the Palomino (2001) architecture (180 nm), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (180 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1500+ scores 188 against the Pentium 4 1.80's 225 — a 17.9% lead for the Pentium 4 1.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1500+Pentium 4 1.80
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
1.8 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
256 kB
Process
180 nm
180 nm
Architecture
Palomino (2001)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
188
225+20%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1500+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon XP 1500+Pentium 4 1.80
Socket
A
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon XP 1500+) / not specified (Pentium 4 1.80). Primary use case: Athlon XP 1500+ targets Desktop.

FeatureAthlon XP 1500+Pentium 4 1.80
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1500+ was priced at $130, while the Pentium 4 1.80 came in at $562. On launch pricing ($130 vs $562), Athlon XP 1500+ was $432 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1500+ delivers 1.4 pts/$ vs 0.4 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 1.80 — making the Athlon XP 1500+ the 113.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1500+Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP
$130-77%
$562
Performance per Dollar
1.4+250%
0.4
Release Date
2001
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.