Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2200+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon XP 2000+

1 Cores1 Thrd70 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2002
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2000+
1 / 1
252
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Athlon XP 2200+
1 / 1
280
+11.1%
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoAthlon XP 1900+
brand logoRyzen 5 5600G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon XP 2000+
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Athlon XP 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2000+

2002

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 2200+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (252 vs 280).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).

    Athlon XP 2200+

    2001

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Costs $98 less on MSRP ($241 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
    • ✅Delivers 56.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
    • ✅Draws 68W instead of 70W, a 2W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon XP 2200+ better than Athlon XP 2000+?
    Yes. Athlon XP 2200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 11.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 2200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon XP 2200+ is the better buy right now. Athlon XP 2200+ comes in $98 cheaper on MSRP at $241 MSRP versus $339 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.3% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon XP 2000+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon XP 2000+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 2000+

    The Athlon XP 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 252 points. Launch price was $25.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 2200+

    The Athlon XP 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 280 points. Launch price was $85.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon XP 2000+ and Athlon XP 2200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Athlon XP 2000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon XP 2200+ — a 7.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2200+. Both are built on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture using a 180 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2000+ scores 252 against the Athlon XP 2200+'s 280 — a 10.5% lead for the Athlon XP 2200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Athlon XP 2200+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.67 GHz
    1.8 GHz+8%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    256 kB
    Process
    180 nm
    130 nm-28%
    Architecture
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    PassMark
    252
    280+11%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    —
    200
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    —
    200
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the A socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-266 on the Athlon XP 2000+ versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2200+ — the Athlon XP 2000+ supports -200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 2000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: VIA KT133A,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2000+) and KT333,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2200+).

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Athlon XP 2200+
    Socket
    A
    A
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR1-266
    DDR-266
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB+100%
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support None virtualization. Primary use case: Athlon XP 2200+ targets Legacy Desktop.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Athlon XP 2200+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    None
    Target Use
    —
    Legacy Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon XP 2000+ was priced at $339, while the Athlon XP 2200+ came in at $241. On launch pricing ($339 vs $241), Athlon XP 2200+ was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2000+ delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 2200+ — making the Athlon XP 2200+ the 43.9% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Athlon XP 2200+
    MSRP
    $339
    $241-29%
    Performance per Dollar
    0.7
    1.2+71%
    Release Date
    2002
    2001
    Search Athlon XP 2000+ on AmazonSearch Athlon XP 2200+ on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.