Athlon XP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 1.80

AMD

Athlon XP 2000+

1 Cores1 Thrd70 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

1 Cores1 Thrd67 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 1.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2000+

2002

Why buy it

  • +12% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $223 less on MSRP ($339 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 4 1.80.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (225 vs 252).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 2000+.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon XP 2000+ better than Pentium 4 1.80?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 4 1.80 is ahead with 7.8% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2000+ pulls ahead with 12% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 12% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon XP 2000+ is the better buy right now. Athlon XP 2000+ comes in $223 cheaper on MSRP at $339 MSRP versus $562 MSRP, and it still gives you 12% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium 4 1.80 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 7.8% higher max boost clock. It is also 85.7% better value on MSRP (0.7 vs 0.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon XP 2000+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon XP 2000+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 2000+

    The Athlon XP 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 252 points. Launch price was $25.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 1.80

    The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon XP 2000+ and Pentium 4 1.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Athlon XP 2000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 — a 7.5% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Athlon XP 2000+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (180 nm), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (180 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2000+ scores 252 against the Pentium 4 1.80's 225 — a 11.3% lead for the Athlon XP 2000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Pentium 4 1.80
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.67 GHz
    1.8 GHz+8%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    256 kB
    Process
    180 nm
    180 nm
    Architecture
    Thorton (2001−2003)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    252+12%
    225
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon XP 2000+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Pentium 4 1.80
    Socket
    A
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR1-266
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: None (Athlon XP 2000+) / not specified (Pentium 4 1.80).

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Pentium 4 1.80
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon XP 2000+ was priced at $339, while the Pentium 4 1.80 came in at $562. On launch pricing ($339 vs $562), Athlon XP 2000+ was $223 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2000+ delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 0.4 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 1.80 — making the Athlon XP 2000+ the 60% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon XP 2000+Pentium 4 1.80
    MSRP
    $339-40%
    $562
    Performance per Dollar
    0.7+75%
    0.4
    Release Date
    2002
    2001

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.