Athlon XP 2500+
Celeron 2.30
Athlon XP 2500+ vs Celeron 2.30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 2500+ vs Celeron 2.30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 2500+ vs Celeron 2.30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 2500+
2003Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 73W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 2.30.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (320 vs 325).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($172 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Celeron 2.30
2003Why buy it
- ✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $172 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 1.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $172 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 2500+.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 2.30 better than Athlon XP 2500+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 2500+ vs Celeron 2.30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon XP 2500+
The Athlon XP 2500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 2500+ and Celeron 2.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Athlon XP 2500+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Athlon XP 2500+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2500+ scores 320 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 1.6% lead for the Celeron 2.30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2500+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.3 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+300% | 128 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 320 | 325+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 2500+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 2.30 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon XP 2500+ versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 — the Celeron 2.30 supports -200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket A (Athlon XP 2500+) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).
| Feature | Athlon XP 2500+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Athlon XP 2500+) vs No (Celeron 2.30). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2500+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 2500+ was priced at $172, while the Celeron 2.30 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($172 vs $100), Celeron 2.30 was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2500+ delivers 1.9 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.30 — making the Celeron 2.30 the 54.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2500+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $172 | $100-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 3.3+74% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2003 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 2500+ and Celeron 2.30
