Athlon XP 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.40

Athlon XP 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.40 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2600+

1 / 1

340

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 1.40

1 / 1

345

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2600+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 1.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (340 vs 345).
❌Launch MSRP is still $98 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌183.3% higher power demand at 68W vs 24W.

Pentium M 1.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 24W instead of 68W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.40 better than Athlon XP 2600+?

Yes. Pentium M 1.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 1.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 1.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $98 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 2600+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2600+

The Athlon XP 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 340 points. Launch price was $23.

Pentium M 1.40

The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 2600+ and Pentium M 1.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Athlon XP 2600+ versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2600+. The Athlon XP 2600+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.40 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2600+ scores 340 against the Pentium M 1.40's 345 — a 1.5% lead for the Pentium M 1.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2600+	Pentium M 1.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.92 GHz+37%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+51100%	1 MB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Barton (2001−2004)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	340	345+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2600+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 1.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.