Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core Solo T1300

Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core Solo T1300 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2800+

1 / 1

380

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Solo T1300

1 / 1

385

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core Solo T1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core Solo T1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2800+

2001

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core Solo T1300.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (380 vs 385).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($375 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
❌3600% higher power demand at 74W vs 2W.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $375 MSRP).
✅Delivers 81.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 1.0 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $375 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 74W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 2800+.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Athlon XP 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 2800+ is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in $166 cheaper on MSRP at $209 MSRP versus $375 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon XP 2800+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 81.8% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 1.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core Solo T1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2800+

The Athlon XP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 74 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $149.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 2800+ and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.25 GHz on the Athlon XP 2800+ versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 30.2% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2800+. The Athlon XP 2800+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2800+ scores 380 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2800+	Core Solo T1300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.25 GHz+36%	1.66 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+25500%	2 MB
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Barton (2001−2004)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	380	385+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2800+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core Solo T1300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon XP 2800+	Core Solo T1300
Socket	A	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon XP 2800+) / not specified (Core Solo T1300). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2800+ targets Legacy Desktop.

Feature	Athlon XP 2800+	Core Solo T1300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 2800+ was priced at $375, while the Core Solo T1300 came in at $209. On launch pricing ($375 vs $209), Core Solo T1300 was $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2800+ delivers 1.0 pts/$ vs 1.8 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1300 — making the Core Solo T1300 the 58% better value option.

Feature	Athlon XP 2800+	Core Solo T1300
MSRP	$375	$209-44%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	1.8+80%
Release Date	2001	2006

Search Athlon XP 2800+ on Amazon

Search Core Solo T1300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.