
Atom C3955

Core i3-1115G4
Atom C3955 vs Core i3-1115G4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom C3955 vs Core i3-1115G4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom C3955 vs Core i3-1115G4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom C3955
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,803 vs 5,860).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 32W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-1115G4
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 32W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Atom C3955 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3955 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1115G4 better than Atom C3955?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3955 vs Core i3-1115G4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3955
The Atom C3955 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 32 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,803 points. Launch price was $434.

Core i3-1115G4
The Core i3-1115G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,860 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Atom C3955 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i3-1115G4 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3955 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Atom C3955 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4 — a 52.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom C3955 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-1115G4 uses Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Atom C3955 scores 5,803 against the Core i3-1115G4's 5,860 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-1115G4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3955 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4.
| Feature | Atom C3955 | Core i3-1115G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+700% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+71% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+167% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 5,803 | 5,860 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,579 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3955 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-1115G4 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3955 versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4 — the Core i3-1115G4 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3955 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3955) vs 4 (Core i3-1115G4) — the Atom C3955 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Atom C3955 | Core i3-1115G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12+200% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3955) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4). The Core i3-1115G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Atom C3955 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4 rivals Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Feature | Atom C3955 | Core i3-1115G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













