Atom C3958
VS
Core i3-6098P

Atom C3958 vs Core i3-6098P

Intel

Atom C3958

16 Cores16 Thrd31 WWMax: 2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i3-6098P

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3958 is positioned at rank 902 and the Core i3-6098P is on rank 550, so the Core i3-6098P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3958

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
23751%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4484%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3984%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3078%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
97%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
96%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
95%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
95%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
94%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
94%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
93%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
93%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
91%
#902
Atom C3958
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
96%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
96%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6098P

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9168%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8663%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6290%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1895%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1501%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1313%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
752%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
742%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
676%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
676%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
668%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
650%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
641%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
639%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
633%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
96%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
97%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
96%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
95%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
100%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
100%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
99%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
99%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
97%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
96%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
96%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3958 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3958Core i3-6098P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6098P (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3958Core i3-6098P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3958 and Core i3-6098P

Intel

Atom C3958

The Atom C3958 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,929 points. Launch price was $449.

Intel

Core i3-6098P

The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

The Atom C3958 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i3-6098P offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3958 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3958 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-6098P (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom C3958 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-6098P uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3958 scores 3,929 against the Core i3-6098P's 3,978 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-6098P. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3958 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6098P.

FeatureAtom C3958Core i3-6098P
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+700%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
16 MB+433%
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+3100%
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,929
3,978+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3958 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6098P uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3958 versus 2133 on the Core i3-6098P — the Core i3-6098P supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3958 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3958) vs 16 (Core i3-6098P) — the Core i3-6098P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom C3958Core i3-6098P
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
2133+53225%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+419430300%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3958) / true (Core i3-6098P). The Core i3-6098P includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Atom C3958 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom C3958Core i3-6098P
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 510
Virtualization
true