Atom D2560 vs Celeron E1400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2560 vs Celeron E1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2560 vs Celeron E1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2560

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Celeron E1400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron E1400

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D2560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 765).
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Atom D2560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2560 better than Celeron E1400?

Yes. Atom D2560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D2560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2560 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2560 vs Celeron E1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2560

The Atom D2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron E1400

The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E1400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom D2560 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom D2560 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E1400 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2560 scores 765 against the Celeron E1400's 715 — a 6.8% lead for the Atom D2560. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Atom D2560 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1400.

Feature	Atom D2560	Celeron E1400
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	765+7%	715
Geekbench 6 Single	—	260
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	470

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2560 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E1400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2560 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1400 — the Atom D2560 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E1400 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2560) vs 2 (Celeron E1400). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2560) vs 0 (Celeron E1400) — the Atom D2560 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2560) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1400).

Feature	Atom D2560	Celeron E1400
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2560) / No (Celeron E1400). The Atom D2560 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Celeron E1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.