Atom D2560 vs Celeron B830
Atom D2560
Celeron B830
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D2560 is positioned at rank 218 and the Celeron B830 is on rank 869, so the Atom D2560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom D2560
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B830
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom D2560 | Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom D2560 | Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom D2560 and Celeron B830
Atom D2560
The Atom D2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron B830
The Celeron B830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
The Atom D2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron B830's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom D2560 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B830 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Atom D2560 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Atom D2560 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron B830 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2560 scores 765 against the Celeron B830's 815 — a 6.3% lead for the Celeron B830. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Atom D2560 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B830.
| Feature | Atom D2560 | Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Cedarview (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 765 | 815+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D2560 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron B830 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron B830 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2560) vs 2 (Celeron B830). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2560) vs 16 (Celeron B830) — the Celeron B830 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2560) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B830).
| Feature | Atom D2560 | Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2560) / VT-x (Celeron B830). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2560) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B830) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B830 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Atom D2560 | Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom D2560 and Celeron B830
