Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Atom D2560

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Atom D2560 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-57

1 / 1

720

0.0%

Athlon 64 2600+

Athlon 64 3100+

Athlon 64 3400+

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom D2560

2 / 4

765

+6.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Atom D2560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Atom D2560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-57

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D2560 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (720 vs 765).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while Atom D2560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌10300% higher power demand at 104W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom D2560

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 104W, a 103W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Athlon 64 FX-57 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2560 better than Athlon 64 FX-57?

Yes. Atom D2560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D2560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2560 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,031 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 FX-57 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2005 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (0.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 939.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Atom D2560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-57

The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom D2560

The Atom D2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-57 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom D2560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom D2560 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus 2 GHz on the Atom D2560 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-57. The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Atom D2560 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Atom D2560's 765 — a 6.1% lead for the Atom D2560. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-57 vs 1 MB on the Atom D2560.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Atom D2560
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark	720	765+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D2560 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2560 — the Atom D2560 supports -366.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 FX-57) vs 1 (Atom D2560). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-57) vs 4 (Atom D2560) — the Atom D2560 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 FX-57) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2560).

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Atom D2560
Socket	939	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4