Athlon 64 FX-57
E1-2200
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs E1-2200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs E1-2200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs E1-2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 FX-57
2005Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E1-2200 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (720 vs 802).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while E1-2200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1055.6% higher power demand at 104W vs 9W.
E1-2200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 104W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is E1-2200 better than Athlon 64 FX-57?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs E1-2200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 FX-57
The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.
E1-2200
The E1-2200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.05 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 802 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-57 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1-2200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1-2200 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus 1.05 GHz on the E1-2200 — a 90.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-57. The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the E1-2200 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the E1-2200's 802 — a 10.8% lead for the E1-2200.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | E1-2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+167% | 1.05 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1024 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 28 nm-69% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 720 | 802+11% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-2200 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | E1-2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-57 and E1-2200
