Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium T2370

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium T2370 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-57

1 / 1

720

0.0%

Athlon 64 2600+

Athlon 64 3100+

Athlon 64 3400+

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T2370

745

+3.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-57

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2370 across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (720 vs 745).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($1,031 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌197.1% higher power demand at 104W vs 35W.

Pentium T2370

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $945 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1140.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 104W, a 69W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T2370 better than Athlon 64 FX-57?

Yes. Pentium T2370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium T2370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 30 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.5% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium T2370 is the better buy right now. Pentium T2370 comes in $945 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $1,031 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1140.5% better value on MSRP (8.7 vs 0.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium T2370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2005). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Pentium T2370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-57

The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium T2370

The Pentium T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 745 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-57 is built on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Pentium T2370's 745 — a 3.4% lead for the Pentium T2370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-57 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2370.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Pentium T2370
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	—
PassMark	720	745+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Pentium T2370
Socket	939	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-57 was priced at $1031, while the Pentium T2370 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($1031 vs $86), Pentium T2370 was $945 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-57 delivers 0.7 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Pentium T2370 — making the Pentium T2370 the 170.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Pentium T2370
MSRP	$1031	$86-92%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	8.7+1143%
Release Date	2005	2008

Search Athlon 64 FX-57 on Amazon

Search Pentium T2370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.