Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo L7400
Athlon 64 FX-57
Core 2 Duo L7400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-57 is positioned at rank 1137 and the Core 2 Duo L7400 is on rank 434, so the Core 2 Duo L7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-57
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo L7400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Core 2 Duo L7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Core 2 Duo L7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo L7400
Athlon 64 FX-57
The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo L7400
The Core 2 Duo L7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-57 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo L7400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo L7400 has 1 more core. The Athlon 64 FX-57 is built on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Core 2 Duo L7400's 765 — a 6.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7400. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-57 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7400.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Core 2 Duo L7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 720 | 765+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo L7400 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Core 2 Duo L7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo L7400
