Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo T5200

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-57

1 / 1

720

+2.1%

Athlon 64 2600+

Athlon 64 3100+

Athlon 64 3400+

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5200

2 / 2

705

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo T5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-57

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5100% higher power demand at 104W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5200

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 104W, a 102W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (705 vs 720).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-57 better than Core 2 Duo T5200?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-57 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-57 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-57 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 FX-57 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,031 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (0.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo T5200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-57

The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo T5200

The Core 2 Duo T5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-57 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo T5200 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5200 — a 51.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-57. The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Core 2 Duo T5200's 705 — a 2.1% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-57. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-57	Core 2 Duo T5200
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+69%	1.66 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	720+2%	705

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.