Atom N2600
VS
A6-6400K

Atom N2600 vs A6-6400K

Intel

Atom N2600

2 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A6-6400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N2600 is positioned at rank 40 and the A6-6400K is on rank 688, so the Atom N2600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N2600

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
93%
#28
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
192%
#29
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
189%
#30
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
174%
#31
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
173%
#32
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
171%
#34
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
165%
#35
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
159%
#36
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
158%
#37
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
154%
#40
Atom N2600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
98%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12379%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11697%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8493%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2559%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1773%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1015%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1002%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
913%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
912%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
902%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
878%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
862%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
854%
#688
A6-6400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
99%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
98%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
97%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-6400K leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom N2600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom N2600A6-6400K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom N2600A6-6400K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N2600 and A6-6400K

Intel

Atom N2600

The Atom N2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 3.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,528 points. Launch price was $47.

AMD

A6-6400K

The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Atom N2600 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-6400K's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom N2600 versus 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K — a 87.7% clock advantage for the A6-6400K (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Atom N2600 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-6400K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2600 scores 1,528 against the A6-6400K's 1,511 — a 1.1% lead for the Atom N2600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N2600A6-6400K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
4.1 GHz+156%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+144%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1024 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,528+1%
1,511
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N2600 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-6400K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom N2600 versus 1866 on the A6-6400K — the A6-6400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-6400K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 2 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2600) vs 2 (A6-6400K). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom N2600) vs 16 (A6-6400K) — the A6-6400K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2600) and FM2 (A6-6400K).

FeatureAtom N2600A6-6400K
Socket
FCBGA559
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB+6553500%
32
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N2600) / true (A6-6400K). Both include integrated graphics Intel GMA 3600 (Atom N2600) and Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6400K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureAtom N2600A6-6400K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3600
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true