
Atom N2600 vs Celeron N4020

Atom N2600

Celeron N4020
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N2600 is positioned at rank 40 and the Celeron N4020 is on rank 993, so the Atom N2600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2600
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4020
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N2600 | Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N2600 | Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N2600 and Celeron N4020

Atom N2600
The Atom N2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 3.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,528 points. Launch price was $47.

Celeron N4020
The Celeron N4020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,535 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom N2600 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N4020's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom N2600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N4020 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Atom N2600 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4020 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2600 scores 1,528 against the Celeron N4020's 1,535 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N4020. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N2600 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4020.
| Feature | Atom N2600 | Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+75% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz+45% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
| PassMark | 1,528 | 1,535 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N2600 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4020 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom N2600 | Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom N2600 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3600), while the Celeron N4020 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom N2600 | Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3600 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











