Atom N280
VS
Athlon XP 2200+

Atom N280 vs Athlon XP 2200+

Intel

Atom N280

1 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N280 is positioned at rank 367 and the Athlon XP 2200+ is on rank 1121, so the Atom N280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N280

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
100%
#355
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
515%
#356
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
507%
#357
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
466%
#358
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
464%
#359
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
459%
#361
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
444%
#362
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
425%
#363
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
425%
#364
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
413%
#367
Atom N280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
268720%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
253914%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
184362%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55541%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43994%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38486%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
22043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21755%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19809%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19807%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19585%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
19057%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18791%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18715%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18545%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
100%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
97%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
95%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
89%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
87%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
83%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
77%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
76%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
72%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
70%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N280 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom N280Athlon XP 2200+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2200+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom N280Athlon XP 2200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N280 and Athlon XP 2200+

Intel

Atom N280

The Atom N280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

The Athlon XP 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 280 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

The Atom N280 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon XP 2200+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Atom N280 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon XP 2200+ — a 185% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2200+. The Atom N280 uses the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon XP 2200+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N280 scores 285 against the Athlon XP 2200+'s 280 — a 1.8% lead for the Atom N280. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N280Athlon XP 2200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
1.8 GHz+2471%
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Thorton (2001−2003)
PassMark
285+2%
280
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N280 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2200+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Atom N280 versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2200+ — the Atom N280 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel PBGA437 (Atom N280) and KT333,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2200+).

FeatureAtom N280Athlon XP 2200+
Socket
PBGA437
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N280) / None (Athlon XP 2200+). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2200+ targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAtom N280Athlon XP 2200+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop