Atom N280
Sempron 2400+
Atom N280 vs Sempron 2400+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom N280 vs Sempron 2400+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom N280 vs Sempron 2400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom N280
2009Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 62W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Sempron 2400+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (262 vs 285).
- ❌2380% higher power demand at 62W vs 2.5W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom N280 better than Sempron 2400+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N280 vs Sempron 2400+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Atom N280
The Atom N280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 2400+
The Sempron 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 262 points. Launch price was $27.
Processing Power
The Atom N280 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 2400+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Atom N280 versus 1.67 GHz on the Sempron 2400+ — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Sempron 2400+. The Atom N280 uses the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 2400+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N280 scores 285 against the Sempron 2400+'s 262 — a 8.4% lead for the Atom N280. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N280 | Sempron 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 1.67 GHz+2286% |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | DiamondVille (2008−2009) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| PassMark | 285+9% | 262 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N280 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 2400+ uses A (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom N280 | Sempron 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PBGA437 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N280 and Sempron 2400+
