Athlon XP 2200+
VS
Atom N280

Athlon XP 2200+ vs Atom N280

AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Atom N280

1 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 2200+ is positioned at rank 1121 and the Atom N280 is on rank 367, so the Atom N280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
268720%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
253914%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
184362%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55541%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43994%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38486%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
22043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21755%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19809%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19807%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19585%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
19057%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18791%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18715%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18545%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
100%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
97%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
95%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
89%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
87%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
83%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
77%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
76%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
72%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
70%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N280

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
100%
#355
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
515%
#356
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
507%
#357
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
466%
#358
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
464%
#359
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
459%
#361
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
444%
#362
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
425%
#363
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
425%
#364
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
413%
#367
Atom N280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N280 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon XP 2200+Atom N280
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2200+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon XP 2200+Atom N280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 2200+ and Atom N280

AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

The Athlon XP 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 280 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Atom N280

The Atom N280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 2200+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N280's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon XP 2200+ versus 0.07 GHz on the Atom N280 — a 185% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2200+. The Athlon XP 2200+ uses the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N280 uses DiamondVille (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2200+ scores 280 against the Atom N280's 285 — a 1.8% lead for the Atom N280. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 2200+Atom N280
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+2471%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Thorton (2001−2003)
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
PassMark
280
285+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2200+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N280 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2200+ versus DDR2-533 on the Atom N280 — the Atom N280 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: KT333,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2200+) and Intel PBGA437 (Atom N280).

FeatureAthlon XP 2200+Atom N280
Socket
A
PBGA437
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon XP 2200+) / not specified (Atom N280). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2200+ targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAthlon XP 2200+Atom N280
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop