Athlon MP 2400+ vs Athlon XP 2200+

AMD

Athlon MP 2400+

1 Cores1 Thrd60 WWMax: 2 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Athlon XP 2200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon MP 2400+

2002

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $90 less on MSRP ($151 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
  • Delivers 73.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($151 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
  • Draws 60W instead of 68W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 2200+.

Athlon XP 2200+

2001

Why buy it

  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon MP 2400+.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon MP 2400+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (280 vs 305).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $151 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon MP 2400+ better than Athlon XP 2200+?
Yes. Athlon MP 2400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon MP 2400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon MP 2400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon MP 2400+ is the better buy right now. Athlon MP 2400+ comes in $90 cheaper on MSRP at $151 MSRP versus $241 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 73.9% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon MP 2400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Athlon XP 2200+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon MP 2400+

The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.

AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

The Athlon XP 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 280 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon MP 2400+ and Athlon XP 2200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon XP 2200+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2400+. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon XP 2200+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Athlon XP 2200+'s 280 — a 8.5% lead for the Athlon MP 2400+.

FeatureAthlon MP 2400+Athlon XP 2200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz+11%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
256 kB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
K7 (2000−2004)
Thorton (2001−2003)
PassMark
305+9%
280
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
200
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR-266 memory speed. The Athlon MP 2400+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2400+) and KT333,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2200+).

FeatureAthlon MP 2400+Athlon XP 2200+
Socket
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon MP 2400+) / None (Athlon XP 2200+). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2200+ targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAthlon MP 2400+Athlon XP 2200+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon MP 2400+ was priced at $151, while the Athlon XP 2200+ came in at $241. On launch pricing ($151 vs $241), Athlon MP 2400+ was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon MP 2400+ delivers 2.0 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 2200+ — making the Athlon MP 2400+ the 53.9% better value option.

FeatureAthlon MP 2400+Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP
$151-37%
$241
Performance per Dollar
2.0+67%
1.2
Release Date
2002
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.